(
main | news
| bands | songs
| about | guest
| linux | inspire
reviews | links
| backup | faq
| how to | message
| search )
1999-12-11 One funny remark is that; I had no wish to once again reinstall all my software after my Windows 2000 tests. So I ( against all recommendations ) just installed Windows 98 right into the original Windows 95 folder. I know that should mean trouble, but in fact, all previously installed software works just perfect. AND is speedier than under Windows 95. I guess that Windows 98 have had more bad reputation than it rightfully earns. It really seems to be a much better OS than Windows 95. Of course NT4 and Windows 2000 is very stable, but both lacks a good portion of both hardware and software support. A compromise necessary to be had, to keep system security (Which is not very important in a home environment, where one just want´s maximum compability ).
The Linux community have really made noice over Windows,
but to be perfectly honest: Linux is practically USELESS and
utterly time consuming for productive work, at it´s current stage
( YES, I have tested a few of the latest distributions, I like SuSE
Linux best ). As cheap server software: O.K.. At home: Laugh
out loud ! But I guess that Linux could be a reasonable desktop alternative
in, mabe two years ( when they´ve sorted out the GUI, fixed an
OLE model and provided decent graphics and font support
plus got rid of the necessity to use the command line. And of
course: A functional copy of Windows Explorer. Hmm, why not use
Windows ? ). Anyway, it´s fun tweakin´around with Linux, but one can´t
say it´s the least productive in any obvious way.
2000-01-021999-12-261999-12-181999-12-111999-12-03(
main | news
| bands |
songs | about
| guest |
linux | inspire
|