( main
| news |
bands | songs
| about |
guest |
linux | inspire
reviews |
links | backup
| faq |
how to | message
| search )
![]()
2001-11-07 Wow ! I'm still so lazy ;-) That means, I almost never update this site. Not so this time neither, I'll just write a few lines. First, I've finally built myself a new computer as my old can was getting annoyingly slow, especially under Windows XP and also very much when using this Dreamweaver Ultradev 4.01 I always prefer. Not talking about games, the newer ones where practically unplayable on my old PC. So what did I build ? Being on a very tight budget, I didn't want to waste as much as when I bought the old one way back when it was modern(I'll probably use it for something, it's still functioning). Here it goes: 1.
ECS K7S5A SiS735 mainboard DDR/SDRAM AGP4x. The SiS735 chip
got a topranking at tomshardware.com, as in some aspects, the fastest
chipset for the Athlon platform. Only barely beaten by the new VIA
KT266A. But way cheaper. Using latest AGP driver of 26/10 2001 (New) Even
though some parts where in the old box, none is original, so I have
completely replaced what I once bought. And what did this upgrade
cost(not that I'm finished yet) ? Including the PC2100 DDR SDRAM I
bought just today, a mere 450$ :-) Now running the final retail version
of Windows XP Professional(and Mandrake 8.1 of course) this computer
rockets on the desktop, while not being the fastest gamers PC around,
now I can at least play ALL new games without problems. But where
this PC excels is as a work PC, it's really fast, no glue whatsoever
and this mighty Ultradev which I prefer to use for writing my site
now behaves neat as Windows notepad ;-) Not talking about multimedia,
now I can just almost play softsynths LIVE from my keyboard even though
SB Live! doesn't have any ASIO support !?! It's that fast :-) Now
I just wish to upgrade to ie Soundblaster Audigy which sports full
ASIO support and I will never need any hardware synths at all anymore,
isn't that amazing ? I have installed Sonar 1.3 and Cubase 5.0 VST32
already, and they both seem to work as champs under XP so I have lot's
of thing to do to start to utilize my new computing power, that's
all folks SeeYa / Per
2001-08-28
Todays report on state of things; so
now I'm running the final version, RTM, of Windows XP Professional.
Build 2600. It IS very good, even speedy. I used the new XP powertoys
to tweak menuspeed amongst other things, so now it even feels faster
than Win2k. I'm not starting to build my system around it yet though,
as I've only got me a 120day evaluation version from Microsoft and
I've just installed lot's of useful software under Win2k. But Microsoft
has said that they will ship betatesters a boxed full version in october/november,
so I guess that will be the time when I will wipe out Win2k for good(I
also have an 180day version of XP Home edition RTM, but I hardly believe
I will ever use it. Professional is the clear choice for a power user).
Linuxwise;
RedHat have released Beta 2 of Roswell but I'm not running it. Roswell
Beta 1 is already wiped out, but it was good. Now I'm running Mandrake
Linux 8.1 beta 1 instead, and that one is VERY good I believe. Still
only beta 1, can I believe that ? No hehe. Best Linux I've met so
far, which is promising for ML 8.1 as a final product. In fact, it
seems like the standard of Linux distributions in general have dramatically
improved just during this year. Also,
EXT3 have debuted in full scale as the filesytem of choice for Linux.
I ran it myself under Roswell, and it felt no worse than ReiserFS
but much better than the old EXT2. Now theres also reports that EXT3
is extremely robust under very heavy file transactions, which hasn't
been known to be the fact for other journaling filesystems under Linux
even though no shortcomings are usually discovered under normal use.
I'm pretty sure I will begin to use EXT3 from now on. I've also done
the ocassional thing of aquiring me a new piece of hardware; a DVD
player. An Aopen 1240(12x dvd 40x cd). The purchase was motivated
by myself receiving Beta 2 of VisualStudio 7.0(.net) on DVD. I really
had to have full information about this monumental software release
from Microsoft, so I had no choice but to order the DVD version. Over
3GIG:s of software and documents. So now I got me a DVD player it
seems like I have to get me some movies. Any suggestions ? I don't
have an mpeg card, so I have to use the new PowerDVD VR-X.
It will
be extremely interesting to see if my computer actually stands the
challenge of playing back a DVD movie in software ? The program itself
seems super; I even got me dolby surround effects when playing back
a simple mp3 and I'll eat my shoes if this program didn't even sound
better than all normal mp3 players I've used. I'll have to wait til
I've got me a movie, but PowerDVD seems like a really promising piece
of software. Well, well I'm getting tired now, so over and out...
/ Per
I
don´t have time for more updating now, but have a good time
out there, SeeYa / Per 2001-07-21
Hi there ! It´s been a long time ;) I´ve had some
vacation here during summer; bathing, fishing, boatriding and I´ve
even started Inline-skating(no ice for regular skating during summer,
so it seemed like a good idea). I just discovered a new webmail-service;
http://www.hushmail.com . The
fine thing with "Hushmail" is that it features todays strongest
possible encryption so that not even your boss can read your mails.
Great idea ;) To get the service fully secure in all stages though;
you have to send/receive your mails to/from another user using "Hushmail"
as well. No big deal, great for us boys chatting away rudely about
the more computer-litterate of the girls - no risk of being discovered
;) So ? Of course I got me an account; [email protected]
. There´s some other fun stuff going on like; you all know that
"Napster" doesn´t work that well anymore. So what
to do ? There´s many alternatives but I just tried "Win
MX"( http://www.winmx.com/)
and was completely satisfied. A great program with an excellent hit-ratio
on desireable songs ;) Other than that; I´ve spent some time
trying out the new Cakewalk Sonar sequencing/audio package. It´s
to early to post an opinion, but I´m not so sure I really like
it - we will see. In Linux; I´ve installed the new Slackware
8.0 and it was like going back to the stone-age after using Mandrake-Linux.
No recommendation, other than for specialist use. Of course I use
Windows XP Pro RC1 regularly and submit my bug-reports to Microsoft.
Seems like it´s going to be an great OS after all, but it´s
still to early to try and upgrade my everyday use Windows Me-installation
to Windows XP Personal. It´s still to much that doesn´t
work OK. Especially in the CD-burning department. Also, Nvidia headquarters
should be bombed by tons of rotten eggs as Nvidia have pressed Microsoft
to not include Voodoo-graphics support in XP(if you´ve lost
out on recent Voodoo-drivers to use under XP, I can recommend http://www.voodoofiles.com
as their Win2k-drivers works excellent under XP). Very childish, I´m
sure I will get an ATI Radeon 2 instead of an GeForce 3 as my next
graphics card :( Well, well that was about what I was able to share
today, see ya !!! / Per 2001-04-15 Last time I was in Mandrake 8.0 RC1 writing stuff, now I'm in Windows XP Personal (build 2462) again. I just installed Macromedia:s Dreamweaver UltraDev 4.0 in XP. Nice. Dreamweaver totally conforms to the Luna-interface and looks like an native Windows XP application ;) UltraDev is Macromedias answer to Microsofts, by now somewhat aged, Visual InterDev 6.0 (soon replaced by Visual InterDev .net). It is in most aspects totally identical with the "normal" Dreamweaver 4.0, but features lots of tools for easier management of database-driven web-sites (.asp is the most wellknown acronym of these kind of sites). For myself, I haven´t made any deep studies on how to run things with dynamic, "virtual" pages instead of my own static kind. Of course I have had different web-servers running on my "play-PC"; PWS, IIS4, IIS5, Apache Linux/Windows and tried with some pages connecting to databases. But that was all at home, and I was the only visitor. So far, I haven't had energy enough to move my site to a web-hotel with .asp-support (or Linux-wise .php, for that matter). My current host, fortunecity, does not support .asp on this free web-space I'm using. No wonder I haven't been to eager to teach myself. But things change, there are a lot more web-hotels out there these days and chances are I'll soon be moving. Anyway, I already like Dreamweaver and this UltraDev does, at least at the first look, seem like it's a lot easier to manage than Visual InterDev which has been on my HD for long, but not much used. Anyway, you won't see any of my experimental pages here at fortunecity, have to stick to the ancient static kind for now being, but when I move I guess you'll notice, as I use a "redirect" URL which won't change when I switch to another web-host. So far, I've just had a glimpse at UltraDev but it looks like one of these programs almost essential and well worth digging deep into, not to mention my miniscule knowledge of .asp and .php which really needs some serious improvement ;) But, as things are, this program gets me inspired to start teaching myself some more in this database-sitebuilding area - seems like it´s necessary too; who in the world still writes static web-pages ? (hint: old fools...) SeeYa / Per P.S. I haven't really started now either, as I use XP Personal in this setup I´m not really sure IIS is included in the package(prbbly only in Pro)and UltraDev is *almost* non-functinal without a properly running web-server connection, have to check that out now... D.S. 2001-04-14 I got this sudden urge to overclock my main-PC, I haven´t had that before ;) Of course I´ve tried to overclock my old 3Dfx Banshee graphics card sometimes, mostly resulting in black screen ;) Now, I wanted to overclock my CPU; sad enough it looks like it just isn´t possible with the old garbage I have. The bus-speed on the mobo is locked at 66MHz as max. value - meaning I can never go higher than the 300MHz I have with a common P2-processor clocked at that speed. Sh-t ! So I went to a e-forum and got the tip to invest in a cheap socket-converter for my SLOT1-socket, and buy a Celeron 2 instead. Hmm, might be something. But would be nice to know if it works before buying...My main PC uses the by now totally obsolete Intel-chipset 440LX/EX, that was a version not made for modifying much, as is my ibm-customed acer-mobo. Upgrading isn´t for ibm:ers, obviously(if upgrading=overclocking). Then, I do have a slightly more modern PC-chassi in the wardrobe, a machine that went to machine heaven at work some time ago. Mabe it was just some parts that failed, and the mobo and riser-card might still be intact ? If they are, I could do some magic using that old chassi, as the mobo in it is equpped with the more modern 440BX-chipset - featuring many more bus-speeds to choose from. Mabe, if I move all my hardware out of the IBM and puts it in this chassi, I could finally overclock my P2-300 to at least 400MHz ? The good thing: that would be an upgrade totally for free, the bad thing: OhOh, It could take a couple of days to get things working....Then: buying a Celeron 2 - most likely no probs at all, but it would cost 100-150$ and who knows how much faster things actually get on my crappy motherboard ? The only other alternative is buying a new PC, that is out of my budget for time being - so I rather experiment ;) And it is fun.... SeeYa / Per 2001-04-13 Well, Well ;) I just argued for this great WYSIWYG webeditor under Linux.... Hmm, I wasn´t completely wrong; it does work great. With Netscape, that is :-( I had this wonderful edit session, and now when I´m back in Windows I see that the differences between Internet Explorer and Netscape in rendering pages look worse than ever. Both are latest versions, IE5.5SP1 and Netscape 4.77. As Internet Explorer now has about 80% of the surfers, it looks like Microsoft has a stronghold on webdesigners. It´s impossible to design pages without looking at them in IE. If one doesn´t, it looks like Picasso did the site ;) One hope is using Opera as reference under Linux, as it renders more close to IE than Netscape, of course, and even Mozilla. I really hate those Microsmerfs...AARRRGH!!! 2001-04-13 Hi there folks ! It seems like I'm back yet another time ;) It's easter(time flies). I'm deep into the the first release cantidate of Mandrake 8.0, while I'm writing this.As I've told you before, there IS at least one decent WYSIWYG HTML-editor for Linux. Forget Netscape Composer, as it is way crappy. No I'm actually happily using IBM:s WEB SPHERE 4.0 homepage builder, while editing my site this time. It is astonishingly competent, not much worse than my Windows favorite Dreamweaver when it comes to pure functionality. In fact, this is a Windows program too. Of course I'm using it under WINE(wine is not an emulator), which makes it possible to run Windows-programs totally without the OS itself ;) In contrast to most Linux progs, Web Sphere isnīt for free. But I do hope IBM makes some money for providing this great website-building tool. HTML text editors in all honor, but they aren't exactly time savers and we all have other things to do in life than edit text ;) So; if you happen to run Linux and want to keep your site alive - go for IBM:s Web Sphere 4.0 homepage builder. I still havenīt found any nearly as competent competitor running under Linux(let's just hope Macromedia sees the light and ports Dreamweaver & co. to Linux - even though not likely as Macromedia happens to do some business with Microsoft...). Otherwise, Mandrake 8.0 is clearly the most cultivated Linux yet and makes my need to run Windows smaller and smaller - it's just games and music apps(of course) that keeps me there. Despite myself trying to port all my work over to Linux, so does the new Windows XP Personal Beta 2 seem like a fresh new OS. I've been running that too for some time now and it is frighteningly trouble free ;) The new interface is also much needed, as at least I had grown very tired of the old Win 95 look that's been the standard for six years. The new Windows interface(Luna) will be possible to customize much more extensively than any previous version, or even third party apps. That does drain the PC from a few of it's resources, but I really don't see why that should matter much - probably there'll be a 2.2GHz P4 this autumn, and 256MB starts to emerge as standard RAM(with quad bus-speeed in the P4 case). Graphic cards will probably have 64Megs as standard soon, and "real time rendered movies" will be common stuff. On HD:s where soon talking 80-100GIG:s as "standard" and DVD-ROM:s are hitting the shops. Even the Internet will soon look like a giant LAN as broadband-connections of all flavors rapidly spreads over the world. So, those small extra resources required to run Windows XP does seem abysimal, in the light of where we're heading ;) It really runs quick enough on my by now extremely ancient PII-300MHz, so does Linux in all itīs KDE/Gnome glory too of course, even this IBM app I'm running right now writing this for you runs quite OK even though itīs driven by a software abstraction layer mimicing Windows between itself and the underlying Linux-core ;) I donīt see many kinds of software being regarded as "heavy" on modern PC:s(1GHz and away...), I guess that the excellent site Tom's Hardware aren't that unrealistic when they run compressing/uncompressing speed-tests on downloaded DVD-Movies as benchmarks. Where soon talking a 2 hour long high definition movie as being of "normal" file-size, and so we will expect rapid handling of those our new favorite file-types. My own old favorite file-types of the audio kind, now seems mostly like kids toys ;) Haha, good I still like music though - and I do play guitar every day, hmm only struggling to find inspiration between all my "tweakin the shit out of my PC"-attacks.... See Ya at "Blakulla" ! / Per 2000-01-15 2000-01-021999-12-261999-12-181999-12-111999-12-03(
main |
news | bands
| songs |
about | guest
| linux |
inspire
|